Project
Management Tools Recap
October, 2000
In
comparing the various organizational tools available in construction,
one quickly realizes a revolution is taking place. Traditional
software like Primavera’s Expedition and Meridian’s Prolog have
quickly been trying to change to compete with the new web-based
applications. The disadvantage of the old systems being the access
to the data. Being able to get key information on a project from
any web browser is quickly becoming the standard of our the construction
industry.
The
heavy licensing costs of the old systems are evolving to subscription
based services with better features, at a fraction of the cost. Instead
of owning expensive software that frequently needs to be updated,
it has become more affordable to pay a monthly subscription to
a system that is constantly being updated. Smaller firms that
could not afford the expensive LAN systems are finding they can
get better control and be more competitive with the new web-based
applications. Big firms studying these market changes are
realizing they need to wake up or smaller companies will be able
to outperform them. Startup costs, training and interaction with
existing data are the big hurdles.
Advancements
are fueling the effort toward change. Team members are
accepting e-mail as the new communication tool. Bandwidth is
being improved. Just as the fax machine was adopted in eighties,
e-mail is now intertwined into how we conduct business.
Today
we are seeing the evolvement of service providers, not unlike
the “timeshare” idea of software that failed thirty years ago,
but with powerful differences. These new generation service
providers are armed with the powerful data centers like exodus
and uunet, security of data has improved so that by a password,
you can manage your project from anywhere that you can access
the net. The Gartner group, Forrester and Forbes predict that
software as we now know it will be replaced by these custom services
in the next four years. These services are quickly evolving
to be molded to closer to the real work flow, eliminate the inefficiency
of duplicate data entry . Owners having tried these systems,
have experienced the savings and will be insisting on its implementation.
Why
trust another organization to house important data through an
outsourced provider? Few can afford to build data facilities
with the backup power and redundancy expected. It’s too
expensive to manage all the data 24 hours a day, seven days a
week and provide the support needed to an entire team The cost
of providing technical staff has risen sharply as the next generation
companies have increasing demand, with a scarce supply of qualified
technicians.. Hubs go down, switches fail, . Who wants
to be responsible to manage all the hassles? And liable to an
owner for system failure? The new specialist- the ASP is emerging.
Having
vigorously test driven various ASP models the past six months,
few yet offer the complete solution that is desired. Some have
stemmed from the heavy functionality of the stalwart systems
(Expedition and Prolog), others are more design focused (Buzzsaw,
Bricsnet, Viecon) and all are currently laden with to many steps
and data entry processes. But things are quickly changing. Programmers
are listening to project managers with a focus on what counts:
Managing the multitude of cost issues so they easily roll up
into a budget, managing data in a central location so that all
jobs can be easily monitored and the eventual interaction with
accounting. Systems that intuitively allow the whole team
to input data will emerge as the leaders because they save time.
Flexibility to control who sees what and ease of generating auto
reports is another big feature. Keeping things graphically simple
and flat improves speed.
The
great benefit is that we all as users help mold the tool as it
can changes as you use it without the need to buy the latest
version or to take the system off line.
I
have formed a user group in the construction industry where we
all share information. Research on the leading systems is posted
on a web site (asptip.com) where there is no advertising and
we pledge vendor neutrality (we don’t push one system over another).
We use it as a sounding board to tell vendors what we like and
don’t like about various systems.